Flibbertigibbet

you're obviously the pinnacle of intelligence. I mean, you figured out that pink shirts = wierd. For fucks sake, what's so strange about a guy wearing a pink shirt. Are you so narrow-minded that you assume anyone wearing a pink shirt must be gay, or something else out of the ordinary?

maybe he was just wearing a pink shirt because he likes wearing a pink shirt. I don't think you would say "he was wearing a blue shirt, that was wierd." So why is the fact that he was wearing a pink shirt so odd?

Maybe he was gay, and mistook you for Sibby's boyfriend. Or he was checking you out to gather a clearer understanding of what a moron looks like.

yes. pray, tell us why wearing a pink shirt is so wierd, and then shut up please.

Pink is such a god-awful color; that's why it's weird.

If he was wearing an awful shade of blue, then I would indeed have said that he was weird for that, too. In fact, I saw just such a shirt at the Banana Republic the other day. All blue and weird.

Also, I didn't say he was gay because he was wearing a pink shirt. I didn't even say he's gay. I said he was checking me out.

Are you saying there's something wrong with being gay?

Does your friend, the-DJ-who-should-be-fired, Chris Tucker, know that you hold these prejudices?

Definitely weird. Pink is one of those colors that just doesn't work very often. When it does it looks good but you have to wade through a dozen fashion disasters before you find a winner.

Except if I'm wearing it, of course. I can even pull off chartreuse, that's how good I am.

Just hang out at Wild Bills one night and thats all you'll ever see......guys in PINK shirts.College kids mostly.Definatly weird but apears to be the fashion.So,depending how you place the definition of the word gay here....YEAH THAT IS SO GAY!
;-)

Read a little more closely, dipshit. You'll see that I never expressed any sort of "problem with" anyone being gay. I did say it was out of the ordinary, as it is (homosexuals are a minority, as far as sexuality goes, in every part of the world), but certianly did not express anything else or more.

You stupid fuck,
DJJ

You fucking assholes,get the hell outta here!You are starting to mess with the wrong folks!

Then you would not mind reading more closely yourself.

You're the one who implied that there was some problem with my noticing that he was checking me out. You then followed it with attempts to explain why else he would look at me like that without being gay. So, completely without the details of the situation - for example, Sibby was running a couple dozen yard behind me, not beside me - you prefer to say that my judgment is off and that the man is straight.

Why are you still reading my website anyway? If you hate me and you find what I write so boring, why do you continue to bother with it?

You're that awful DJ, Chris Tucker, aren't you?

Go ahead. You can admit it. We won't think any more of you than we do already.

Wrong, and wrong, you vaccuous waste of earth's resources.
I never expressed that there was anything wrong with your noticing that you were being checked out. No one in their right mind (which excludes you, mind you) would have a problem with someone noticing that they were being checked out, despite the fact that one might have only imagined said being-checked-out due to one's extreme vanity *cough cough*. My problem was with your finding a male in a pink shirt so incredibly wierd that you felt the need to tell the world about it.
And for the second wrong- No, I am not chris tucker.

sincerely in awe of your dipshittedness,
DJJ

Hmmm...

Looks like Chris.
Smells like Chris.
Tastes like Chris.
Therefore, must be Chris!

I'm going to have to put a sign up asking people to wipe their feet.

"you prefer to say that my judgment is off and that the man is straight"
-flibbertigibbet

indeed, i was correct all along when i implied that you were thinking this man must be gay because he was wearing a pink shirt. you say i claimed that your judgment, that the man was not straight, was off. Thus, you've admitted that your judgement was that the man was not straight because of the fact that he was wearing a pink shirt.

by all means, please continue to prove your inferior wit by continuing to post grossly inadequate ad hominem rebuttals. it proves that you have nothing of substance with which to respond.

you witless moron,
DJJ

There are two options: either he is straight or he is gay.

I drew neither conclusion based upon the color of his shirt and neither option presents the man as superior in any way. (You'll note that I didn't present a conclusion on his sexuality in my post, either.)

But you said, "Are you so narrow-minded that you assume anyone wearing a pink shirt must be gay?" Which both shows that you did not follow the post well and you believe that it requires narrow-mindedness to draw the conclusion you think I drew.

The alternative, by your flawed reasoning, is that 'open-minded' people will ignore his actions - checking me out - and conclude that his pink shirt is just his manner of self-expression and meaningless except to make the likelihood of his being gay far smaller than it would have been if he had a blue shirt and checked me out.

Notice how 'open-minded' people by your reasoning are incredibly stupid? That's why I can't take you seriously.

Not only did I not base my conclusion on the color of his shirt, I didn't even present it in my post as if I did. And you'll recall, again, that I didn't say he was gay.

So, I can only infer that you think that being gay is a bad thing and that pink shirts are, in fact, out of the ordinary.

Go look up "ad hominem" before you use the phrase. By contrast, you will know that it's actually fair to name you as a hypocrite and a fool. I have every reason.

once again. look again, at your own words. you said that i claimed your judgment that he was gay was off, and that he is in fact straight. yes, this is what you said above, albeit in a more complex way, fool.

That *is* what you said. You said that my thinking he is gay is off and that he is in reality straight. You said in your very first comment, "Are you so narrow-minded that you assume anyone wearing a pink shirt must be gay[?]"

I didn't say that I think he's gay in my post, though. It doesn't really matter to the crux of this discussion, however, whether or not I think he is gay at all - but I do think the man is gay if that's what you're trying to get at.

What matters is that you think that being gay is a bad thing because it is the alternative to what, according to you, an 'open-minded' person would think of the situation. I contend that if someone is that open-minded their brains have fallen out.

In essence you said, "How dare you think that man is gay because he's wearing a pink shirt!!" And I'm saying, "I didn't think anything of the sort about him because he's wearing a pink shirt. I think he's weird because he's wearing a pink shirt. I think he's queer because he was checking me out."

The facts stand that: he was checking me out and wearing a pink shirt.

If it comforts you at all, I think that your prejudice against homosexuals is nearly subconscious. I can see how you would say what you said and not realize that you were being so bigoted. But you should let it go. It's so Jerry Falwell.

You've demonstrated before that you don't have to go through such mental acrobatics just to call me names and curse my very existence. Why the sudden change? Go ahead and admit it: You're in love with me!

Smooch! Smooch! Smooch!

wrong again, moron-shit. i never expressed that there was anything wrong with being gay at all, quite the contrary, in fact. i expressed that there was something wrong with you assuming that this man was gay because he was wearing a pink shirt, which you admittedly did. i never expressed that not being gay = being open minded. i expressed that assuming a man is gay because he is wearing a pink shirt = being not open minded.

read a little more carefully. take an english class or two if that's what it takes to develop better reading comprehension skills, because you'll need better reading comprehension skills than you've displayed if you ever expect to be a valuable, constructive member of society, not to mention attaining a job which will support a middle-class quality of life.

and about your checking ip addresses comment- you were definately lying there, because i am indeed not DJ get gorgeous, dipshit. if you can check them, which you should be able to do, you should do it, as it will prove that you are indeed wrong about this assumption.

you're such an idiot, but because you at least try a little bit, i'll pray for you to get better and more intelligent. i don't want to see anyone stay a moron like you forever, afterall.

DJJ

I did not conclude that he's gay because he was wearing a pink shirt.

I concluded that he's gay because he was checking me out.

You're calling me an idiot, but you're praying. Irony is what that is.

I've already explained how you're a bigot. And in order for you to get better, you're going to have to acknowledge that you have a problem. Don't fight it.

As for IP addresses, you can always post from different locations and change your IP address. It would be ineffective to monitor that to ensure that everyone who says they are DJ Get Gorgeous is, in fact, DJ Get Gorgeous.

Neither does that stop you from being in love with me.

SMOOCH!