In talking with one of my coworkers, I think I know why bosslady is angry with me: I only gave her two weeks notice.
This is true. I recieved the verbal offer on February 22nd and on the 24th I accepted it. 15 minutes after accepting it, I called her to give notice because on the 16th, that's a week from tomorrow, I have to have my stuff moved up to NYC and be sitting in my new office.
Of course, I didn't tell her that I was giving notice as soon as I could reasonably do so. And I suppose I could have asked my new company for more time. But after losing that six-figure income in December for asking for three weeks and knowing that my new job needed someone in the chair ASAP to work on their 2nd largest account, I wasn't willing to do so. So, I can accept some of the responsibility for giving so little notice.
But is two weeks really that little? I don't think so. It's pretty standard. Bosslady also didn't ask me for that information and didn't bother to tell me that it was disappointing to her. So, ultimately, I do think she's behaving irrationally.
Posted by Flibbertigibbet at March 8, 2006 02:04 PM | TrackBackTwo weeks is the standard. More might be expected if you were critical personnel for a particular deliverable or if extensive knowledge sharing was required to transfer your position. Given her demonstrated lack of understanding about what your job is I doubt it is anything more than peevishness and irrationality. If one or more of those criteria apply she certainly doesn't know it.
Posted by: Jim at March 8, 2006 08:50 PMSun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 |