Sean Hannity was talking again today about an amendment to the United States Constitution to ban gay marriage. Bolstered by 11 states, including my home of Georgia, passing amendments to their own constitutions on November 2, Hannity feels certain that such an amendment will be added to the national constitution.
While we're at it, could be please stop referring to ourselves as "the land of the free?" Maybe we could call ourselves "the land of the most free slaves in the modern world."
The Constitution was written to establish limits on, here comes the shocker, THE GOVERNMENT. The Constitution was written to establish the universal supremacy of the individual and protect his rights from the whims, machinations, and righteous indignation of the mob.
This is not a democracy! This is a constitutional republic and that is way better.
I'm not sure when our representatives felt it their perogative to do less than protect the rights of citizens, but all this talk of amendments makes it very clear that they are shirking their jobs for something more lucrative: robbery and slave trading. (As if the other signs weren't plain as day.)
This amendment question is bigger than just that of who should be allowed to visit whom in the hospital. Mark my words: gay or straight, the very idea of an amendment establishing a definition for the word marriage is a threat to your freedom.
Posted by Flibbertigibbet at November 15, 2004 10:17 PMAbsolutely. The thought of bastardizing the Constitution for a partisan morality agenda makes my blood boil. Didn't we do this before? Something about alcohol? Turned out really well, didn't it?
Posted by: Jim at November 16, 2004 08:44 AMI don't think they will attempt to pass any amendment until 2006. I think the strategy for Bush will be to continue making this an issue for the next two years, continue to use the divisive campaigning for Republicans that worked this year, and hope that in 2006 they gain more seats in Congress that will assist in pushing an amendment through. Otherwise, I can't see it ever passing. The only Democrats that will ever vote for it are ones that represent "red" states where they feel their reelection rides on supporting such a ridiculous amendment. I don't think the GOP gained enough seats to pull it off yet. I do however think it would easily pass the 3/4ths of the states legislatures voting on it. And they would only need 30 to vote in favor of it before it would become law. More than half of that number already have laws or amendments doing just that.
Ah well. At least we can go out and get drunk and still have gay gay sex if all else fails.
Posted by: Britton at November 16, 2004 09:36 AMI am on eof those that voted AGAINST gay marriage. A Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Thank god for this ammendment.
Posted by: Mo Mo at November 16, 2004 03:01 PMWell, Mo Mo, I think we know all we need to know about you, then, don't we?
Posted by: Flibby at November 17, 2004 09:30 AMSun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 |