November 07, 2004

And Now for Some Sad News

CNN: Wisconsin district to teach more than evolution

GRANTSBURG, Wisconsin (AP) -- School officials have revised the science curriculum to allow the teaching of creationism, prompting an outcry from more than 300 educators who urged that the decision be reversed.

Members of Grantsburg's school board believed that a state law governing the teaching of evolution was too restrictive. The science curriculum "should not be totally inclusive of just one scientific theory," said Joni Burgin, superintendent of the district of 1,000 students in northwest Wisconsin.

[...]

There have been scattered efforts around the nation for other school boards to adopt similar measures. Last month the Dover Area School Board in Pennsylvania voted to require the teaching of alternative theories to evolution, including "intelligent design" -- the idea that life is too complex to have developed without a creator.

First of all, let me comment on the phrase "totally inclusive of just one scientific theory." So, are they saying that the curriculum should contain only parts of any given theory?

I doubt that teachers are teaching just one scientific theory in their classes. What about relativity? What about electormagnetism? In my highschool, we even discussed a little bit of quantum theory.

The real key to this is the word "scientific." Religion is not scientific. Faith is not scientific. Creationism is not scientific.

There should be no objection to teachers teaching all manner of scientific material to students, but that does not subsume ideas derived from mythology, emotion, or conjecture.

Science is rigorous in its standards and clearly defines what may and may not be called a theory. Creationism is not a theory; it's a fairy tale.

It is incredible to me that we are still having this debate here in the year 2004 and to the extent that we are seriously debating this matter is the extent to which our children will be ill-equipped to confront the facts of reality as they grow up believing the wanting is sufficient foundation for truth and is even stronger than the facts themselves for providing insight into life in reality.

Posted by Flibbertigibbet at November 7, 2004 01:34 PM
Comments

We've got some of this locally too. Cobb county labeled their textbooks with big stickers warning that evolution is only a theory. Those stickers are being challenged in court:

http://www.11alive.com/help/search/search_article.aspx?storyid=54433

Posted by: Jim at November 8, 2004 10:53 AM

While I find this sort of thing disgusting, I have to say that the real issue is not whether evolution or creationism should be taught. The problem is government schools. As long as christians have to pay for the schools too, why can't they have their (bizarre) 'theories' taught? Until gov't schools are closed, we'll continue to have this fight.

Posted by: Michael at November 11, 2004 12:11 PM

I don't disagree that having the government run schools is fundamental to the problem here, and using your logic we can illustrate that further.

Given the Christians are paying for the school and so are Atheists and all have equal claim to the curriculum and their claims are mutually exclusive, it may be argued that these schools cannot rightfully teach ANYTHING insofar as science is concerned.

Other subjects would be at risk from conflicts between various groups as well. Consider Anarchist children, Communist children, and Capitalist children and the impact of those on political science and history classes.

Posted by: Flibbertigibbet at November 11, 2004 02:25 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?